公司团体应该继续有投票权吗?

公司团体应该继续有投票权吗?

你是否同意在选举行政长官候选人提名委员会的委员时,保留公司团体票?

戴耀廷 Benny Tai - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
戴耀廷 Benny Tai - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
你是否同意在選舉行政長官候選人提名委員會的委員時保留公司團體票? Do you agree that corporate voting should be allowed in the selection of members of a nominating committee for Chief Executive candidates?
Richard Cullen - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
Richard Cullen - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
你是否同意在選舉行政長官候選人提名委員會的委員時保留公司團體票? Do you agree that corporate voting should be allowed in the selection of members of a nominating committee for Chief Executive candidates?
區諾軒 Au Nok Hin - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
區諾軒 Au Nok Hin - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
你是否同意在選舉行政長官候選人提名委員會的委員時保留公司團體票? Do you agree that corporate voting should be allowed in the selection of members of a nominating committee for Chief Executive candidates?
陳弘毅 Albert Chen - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
陳弘毅 Albert Chen - 公司團體應該繼續有投票權嗎? Should Corporate Voting Continue?
你是否同意在選舉行政長官候選人提名委員會的委員時保留公司團體票? Do you agree that corporate voting should be allowed in the selection of members of a nominating committee for Chief Executive candidates?
  • Jennifer Eagleton

    I can’t believe that we are still discussing this issue! It is ridiculous that a corporation can vote – and how is this done in practice? Does the boss/board of directors vote? Who decides which corporation can have the vote? Because in HK, several major companies seem to dominate the business sphere – this gives them unparalleled power already. This needs to stop and for the general interests of the people to predominate. Voting should be done by individual persons. A corporation is not a person. No further discussion is needed about this!

    • Just a HongKonger

      Worse still is when subsidiaries are used to obtain multiple votes. For example, if Hutchison Whampoa, Hutchison Port Holdings, Hong Kong Electric, and Cheung Kong all got one vote, that’s effectively four votes for Li Ka-Shing.

    • Y.H. LAM

      I totally agree with the writer.

  • Just a HongKonger

    In the Irish presidential elections, one of the several paths (emphasis on the “several”) to candidacy is block nomination by at least four of the 34 county or city councils. Of course, the membership of each council is still human.

  • 一市民

    公司團體票,當然要取消,我們是選特首,爲甚麼一個“自然人”的從業員,連投票選代表他們界別的委員都不能,偏偏一個“不自然人“的所謂公司團體票,卻能投票選特首?這不是一個莫名其妙的選舉制度嗎?

5 Responses

  1. Jennifer Eagleton
    Jennifer Eagleton %x %A at %I:%M%p |

    I can’t believe that we are still discussing this issue! It is ridiculous that a corporation can vote – and how is this done in practice? Does the boss/board of directors vote? Who decides which corporation can have the vote? Because in HK, several major companies seem to dominate the business sphere – this gives them unparalleled power already. This needs to stop and for the general interests of the people to predominate. Voting should be done by individual persons. A corporation is not a person. No further discussion is needed about this!

    1. Just a HongKonger
      Just a HongKonger %x %A at %I:%M%p |

      Worse still is when subsidiaries are used to obtain multiple votes. For example, if Hutchison Whampoa, Hutchison Port Holdings, Hong Kong Electric, and Cheung Kong all got one vote, that’s effectively four votes for Li Ka-Shing.

    2. Y.H. LAM
      Y.H. LAM %x %A at %I:%M%p |

      I totally agree with the writer.

  2. Just a HongKonger
    Just a HongKonger %x %A at %I:%M%p |

    In the Irish presidential elections, one of the several paths (emphasis on the “several”) to candidacy is block nomination by at least four of the 34 county or city councils. Of course, the membership of each council is still human.

  3. 一市民
    一市民 %x %A at %I:%M%p |

    公司團體票,當然要取消,我們是選特首,爲甚麼一個“自然人”的從業員,連投票選代表他們界別的委員都不能,偏偏一個“不自然人“的所謂公司團體票,卻能投票選特首?這不是一個莫名其妙的選舉制度嗎?