提名委员会的组成办法

提名委员会的组成办法

你认为提名委员会的组成办法应沿用现时选举委员会的组成办法吗(即界别及附属界别分组)?如否,你认为应该如何改变它的组成办法?

陳弘毅 Albert Chen - 提名委員會的組成辦法 What should the Electoral Base of the Nominating Committee be?
陳弘毅 Albert Chen - 提名委員會的組成辦法 What should the Electoral Base of the Nominating Committee be?
你認為提名委員會的組成辦法應沿用現時選舉委員會的組成辦法嗎(包括其界別及附屬界別分組)?如否,你認為應該如何改變它的組成辦法? If the system of sectors and subsectors currently used to form the Election Committee will also be used to form the Nominating Committee, do you believe that system needs to be reformed? If so, what suggestions do you have to reform that system?
區諾軒 Au Nok Hin - 提名委員會的組成辦法 What should the Electoral Base of the Nominating Committee be?
區諾軒 Au Nok Hin - 提名委員會的組成辦法 What should the Electoral Base of the Nominating Committee be?
你認為提名委員會的組成辦法應沿用現時選舉委員會的組成辦法嗎(包括其界別及附屬界別分組)?如否,你認為應該如何改變它的組成辦法? If the system of sectors and subsectors currently used to form the Election Committee will also be used to form the Nominating Committee, do you believe that system needs to be reformed? If so, what suggestions do you have to reform that system?
  • Jennifer Eagleton

    As I mentioned before the nominating committee needs to be full of people that have been elected by universal suffrage rather than be half full of people elected indirectly though complex and narrow franchise. However if the FCs have to remain for the 2017 CE election (but they have to be totally removed subsequently); some smaller ones should either be eliminated (e.g., agriculture and fisheries FC) and other amalgamated, that is, basically minimized.

    • Y.H. LAM

      I agree with the writer.

  • Just a HongKonger

    All directly elected officials in the DCs or Legco. Public nominations should still be allowed.

  • 一市民

    現在提委會的組成,根本就是一個笑話。

    首先,所有界別不能再用公司票,所有從業員都可投票選出代表該界別的委員,這樣才能勉強說得上有一點代表性。

    有些屆別,委員人數明顯跟從業員人數和人口比例不符,這些界別,委員人數要按比例,相應減少或增加。

    同時一些沒界別代別的市民如家庭主婦,退休人士,應新增界別代表他們。

    總之,現在那個全無代表性的提委會組成方法,一定要撤底地改!

4 Responses

  1. Jennifer Eagleton
    Jennifer Eagleton %x %A at %I:%M%p |

    As I mentioned before the nominating committee needs to be full of people that have been elected by universal suffrage rather than be half full of people elected indirectly though complex and narrow franchise. However if the FCs have to remain for the 2017 CE election (but they have to be totally removed subsequently); some smaller ones should either be eliminated (e.g., agriculture and fisheries FC) and other amalgamated, that is, basically minimized.

    1. Y.H. LAM
      Y.H. LAM %x %A at %I:%M%p |

      I agree with the writer.

  2. Just a HongKonger
    Just a HongKonger %x %A at %I:%M%p |

    All directly elected officials in the DCs or Legco. Public nominations should still be allowed.

  3. 一市民
    一市民 %x %A at %I:%M%p |

    現在提委會的組成,根本就是一個笑話。

    首先,所有界別不能再用公司票,所有從業員都可投票選出代表該界別的委員,這樣才能勉強說得上有一點代表性。

    有些屆別,委員人數明顯跟從業員人數和人口比例不符,這些界別,委員人數要按比例,相應減少或增加。

    同時一些沒界別代別的市民如家庭主婦,退休人士,應新增界別代表他們。

    總之,現在那個全無代表性的提委會組成方法,一定要撤底地改!