更多意見


第 2 部分

提名委員會的人數
問題1:提名委員會應由多少人組成?
由 Wu Kwan Cheung 2014-11-17 19:01:11
美國人口近三億,選舉人團只有538人,因此提名委員會人數並非重點。

由 Lui Kenneth Kin Wai 2014-07-23 14:07:05
全部選民應享有同等提名權 不希望提委會人數設限 除非提委會成員由全港選民一人一票等值選出

由 Brian 2014-05-11 23:07:44
The Nominating committee\'s purpose is to vote for the premier, however with Hong Kong\'s vast population of 7 million it only makes sense that the number of people voting for the premier be more representative of the population. Which is why the members of the nominating committee must be increased to a higher number, but not one that is so large that it becomes extremely difficult to manage even a single nomination.

由 Jasmine Kan 2014-05-09 23:24:30
I have read on the news recently that the academics have proposed to double the size of the nominating committee as they want a larger diversity of people to vote and their aim in selecting the Chief Executive by universal suffrage is through the nomination of a \"broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures.” I strongly agree with this statement therefore would follow their proposal in increasing the nominating committee to 2400.

由 Mike Hung 2014-05-06 17:41:06
實質數字沒有頭緒 不過委員會既是代表廣大民眾, 太少就不能反映700萬人多樣性的見解

由 Wong Yin Pok Asgard 2014-05-06 16:52:46
其實重要的是提名委員會產生的方法

由 Benjamin 2014-05-05 20:30:36
因提名委員不應有權作篩選,只是一個核實機構

由 Chen Chapman 2014-05-04 00:10:17
建議由全體立法會議員組成特首提名委員會,然後由全港市民一人一票選特首,此舉可形成內閣政制, 又符合基本法有關特首提名委員會的規定。 機構提名則基本法所無,故不可考慮。

由 李樂軒 2014-05-04 00:09:23
提名委員會要有廣泛代表性,最簡單直接的方法就是所有合資格的選民自動成為提名委員會的一員,三百五十萬約為現時合資格選民的人數。

由 Chan Sau Yi 2014-05-03 23:49:50
本人主張於2016年全數立法會議員由直選產生,提名委員會則由民選區議員和直選立法會議員組成。

由 kelly 2014-05-03 22:13:47
全面廢除公司票和團體票.

由 khc 2014-05-03 19:38:22
愈多人中共愈難出術,也更難被小數人所壟斷。

由 CHENG WAI HIM 2014-05-03 19:02:26
加上區選區內可以以10000-20000比一的比例,選出選舉委員會的代表。

由 Patrick Leung 2014-05-03 12:24:53
提名委員,要由所有全香港選民,分區選出

由 Bosco Li 2014-05-03 03:55:23
The role of the nominating committee should to be to make the best decisions in favor of the public. They represent the will of the people and they have perform that to the fullest. In terms of size it has to be large enough for more opinions and perspectives, but has to be small enough to be efficient and effective. The population of seven million and the committee is currently a size of 1200. Increasing that number to 3000 would help the committee in terms of bring in more opinion and decreasing bias. Increasing the number of committee may slow down the nominating process, but the process will me more detailed and with increased public involvement.

由 梁耀偉 2014-05-03 01:31:23
由直選成為立法會議員的35位議員推廌。按「廣泛代表性」的原則每個議員推廌10人共350人。

由 Yuen Chi Chung 2014-05-03 01:20:54
以全港人口約 700 萬的百分之一人數為基數, 已有足夠人數包含香港主要行業的代表.

由 周頌堯 2014-05-03 00:52:19
人數宜與合資格的全港選民掛鈎。本人提出,若以五百萬合資格選民為例,每三千個選民有一位提名委員會委員,則有大概一千五百多個委員,

由 kelvin 2014-05-03 00:10:38
用選區議員的方式,每4年選一次選舉委員會會成員,職能只限於提名行政長官。

由 林栢熙 2014-05-02 23:23:18
所有選舉委員會解散,由各議會議員作提名委員會

由 Remy Lai 2014-05-02 23:07:44
提名委員會由直選立法會議員組成

由 Rishi Kukreja 2014-05-02 22:45:58
I do not have a clear preference for the size of the NC, as long as the premise for the composition of the NC is fair, and in which every registered voter has an equal say. The current composition of the EC is profoundly unrepresentative, but also highly illogical and overly complicated. It serves an elite group of business representatives from a very narrow political spectrum. As such, it cannot stay. In the consultation paper I have supported the conservative proposal by Hong Kong 2020 (hongkong2020.com) to let all those not represented by the sectors in the first three sectors to participate in elections for directly-elected seats as part of the fourth sector, which envisages adding 317 seats to the existing EC. This is not my ideal, but given the political constraints I figured this had a good chance of being accepted, making the NC more \"broadly representative\" while not upsetting vested interests. Ultimately, though, the NC should be decided by the Hong Kong people in an equal and fair manner.

由 Ryan Chiu 2014-05-02 18:14:28
將全港區議員、立法會議員做提委會 允許全港區議員、立法會議員提名即可反映民意

由 B 2014-05-02 11:02:06
提名會應由立法會議員(民選) + 專業界別組成

由 sn HO 2014-05-01 00:40:19
即所有合資格選民。

由 James 2014-04-30 18:35:22
The more nominating committee, the more help, competition, accomplishment, and organization that will improve Hong Kong constantly.

由 歐陽家和 2014-04-30 17:54:05
基本法從未都冇確實話一定要幾多人,只要有各界咪得囉……人數唔係重要問題。

由 Leung Kwan Yuk 2014-04-30 17:08:44
分兩部份 一部份是由提名會提名 一部份是由大眾市民提名 候選人可以任選其一部份參選 最終都是會交由大眾市民選出來

由 Brian 2014-04-30 11:56:52
全港公民組成提名委員會,由全港合資格選民(居住滿七年或以上香港永久性居民) 組成提名委員會,我相信沒有另一個比由所有選民組成之組織更能表達「廣泛代表性」之意思。

由 Choi Fook Kan 2014-04-30 09:31:31
所有合資格選民

由 Jade Leung 2014-04-30 08:58:54
15%合資格選民人數

由 周婉儀 2014-04-30 03:06:16
全港市民以普及而平等的方式均衡參與。

由 Pat Lau 2014-04-30 01:48:59
數字愈大,愈有代表性。

由 Wong tan Ching 2014-04-30 00:07:32
全面普選議會提名

由 黃浩銘 2014-04-29 23:16:24
提名委員會由全體直選立法會議員組成。

由 Yau Chun Keung 2014-04-29 19:27:30
無限制人數

由 歐陽兆鋒 2014-04-29 19:00:10
增加公能組別及減少多剩的議席

由 周偉雄 2014-04-29 17:09:53
行政長官服務對象是全港市民,為了鼓勵市民的參與度提高,提名委員會應引入更廣泛的地區代表性的參與,擴大委員數目更加令選出來的特首要向公眾負責及減少被大財團對特首及政府施政上的阻礙,並且能有效減低官商勾結的機會。

由 Chapman 2014-04-29 16:50:39
不認為應有上限,因為越多人提名門檻越低

由 Cassandra Leigh Ward 2014-04-29 15:26:48
Having just 1200 members of the nominating committee is not enough. The will of the people needs to be fully expressed and with just 1200 members, it is not fully expressed.

由 Erwin Lee 2014-04-28 02:44:08
The nominating committee should be a group that checks and analyzes the will of the people. It has to have a large enough size due to the large population of Hong Kong, so that the various opinions would be reflected in this group also, but small enough to still operate effectively and as a committee. Currently, Hong Kong has around seven million people, so a committee that triples the current committee is appropriate, so that there is a member in the committee for every two thousand people. There has to be this amount so that the nominating committee has opinions from many different backgrounds and people with various ideologies, although it may slow down the nominating process, ultimately, tripling the dominating committee will allow for the committee to thoroughly check the public\'s nominations and to nominate their own. The biases from a smaller committee are eliminated while the millions of opinions from the public are reduced.

由 Samad Hashmi 2014-04-28 01:46:15
A thousand members for each million residing in Hong Kong.

由 Reb 2014-04-27 23:40:32
With the limited knowledge, I am unable to give a specific number regarding to the size of the nominating committee. However, I believe that the nominating committee works best in a smaller population. The role of the nominating committee should only be restricted to represent ideas from different fields. With a larger population, members are required to compromise and sacrifice their ideologies for the sake of efficiency. Therefore, this may contradict the original intention of having a nominating committee.

由 Jessica 2014-04-27 23:16:08
By only permitting Hong Kong permanent residence to be a member in the Nominating Committee, it will only give a voice to those who have lived in Hong Kong for 8 years or more but those who have lived in HK for 4 year or more should also have a say so that the decisions will be more diverse.

由 David 2014-04-27 18:34:54
I believe that the nominating committee should be about 71,550 members. Reason being the population of Hong Kong is about 7.2 million people, I believe it is only reasonable to have atleast 1% of the representatives in comparison to the population of Hong Kong.

由 pm 2014-04-22 23:16:31
增加廣泛性

由 Jimmy Wu 2014-04-19 22:08:44
由於提名委員會角色有如立法會,區議會等代議政制的特色,因此人數不應太多,但太少的話會變成小圈子選舉.提名委員會人數應設在全港總人口的10%,總比現在的1200人好.

由 霍漢橋 2014-04-18 23:05:31
提名委員會應有全體立法會議員組成。立法會議員自動成為提名委員會委員。

由 陳沛曦 2014-04-17 00:29:41
人數多少與否,提名委員會必須符合均衡參與原則,不能由某部分人(商界)獨大,也不應出現如漁農界比法律界提委人數多,但實際人數較少的情況。

由 Jonathan Ong 2014-04-15 01:55:37
What matters most is not the size of the Nominating Committee, but rather, the composition and the representativeness of this institution.

由 Jason 2014-04-13 21:17:55
This should be up to a panel of local experts to decide. It is more important in my opinion that the sectors be more broadly representative than the overall number, provided that there is a parallel alternative for public nomination. The overall number of 1200 is about 1:5963 residents, which is within what the framers of the US Constitution imagined for an entire nation (1:35000), but over time and with the development of technology has fallen from practice. I nevertheless believe it should be more on the principle that a local government should be the level of government most in touch with and accessible to its local citizens. Provided they are not paid for their services (and thus a burden on the taxpayer), I choose 2000, as it is a round number, and reduces the gap to 1:3578.

由 Glen Ng 2014-04-07 12:47:19
The committee should only be responsible for screening out unsuitable (e.g. not meeting legal requirements) . Yet, they should be elected public officials. Legco members might be a good choices.

由 Kwong Ming Hong 2014-04-04 17:32:48
人數不重要

由 Tsz Kwan Cheng 2014-02-14 10:06:24
All 18+ Hong Kong 3 stars citizens

由 何境豐 2013-12-25 10:58:56
第四界別的政界應加入全體民選區議員。

由 陈灵平 2013-12-19 22:15:09
人数越多越不易操纵

由 balut luk 2013-12-18 15:32:28
由全數立會及區議會議員組成

由 Daniel John Gittings 2013-12-09 17:16:44
Size will partly depend on the nominating method and whether civil nomination is also allowed. A larger committee is more democratic, but care should be taken that it does not become so large as to be unwieldy.

由 Man Chun Wai 2013-12-09 08:27:38
依據 2011 年人口普查或 2016 中期人口普查計算人口比例百份之零點一 (以 2016 年計算約 7000)

由 David TIU 2013-12-05 16:29:54
減少會降低認受性;過多會不利決定候選人名單的「民主程序」設計(如委員會的內部討論過程)。

由 Alan Lau 2013-12-05 00:19:34
四個界別,每個界別共有十八個委員。委員的多少其實沒有太大用處,美國的選舉人也只有五六百人。推選委員會的民主應體現在產生方式,而不是人數。

由 Eric 2013-12-04 22:23:58
Include district councilors

由 Tenny Hui 2013-12-04 14:39:36
提名委員會應為現任直選立法局(35+5)再加全港區議員.

由 Leo Yeung 2013-12-04 13:49:58
所有香港選民應自動加入「提名委員會」(約3450000人, 2012年數目)

由 Kelvin Chan 2013-12-04 13:08:09
太少人會有賂選機會, 太多人, 在選舉提委會時, 選民有機會沒有時間清楚了解候選人的背景

由 John Wong 2013-12-04 12:27:02
provided that general public can also propose the candidates

由 JACK 2013-12-04 10:50:20
按選民人口比例

由 Dick 2013-12-04 10:04:43
提名委員會應由有公信力的社會知名人仕出任.

由 KCM 2013-12-04 08:58:13
Large enough to allow differences

由 張博文 2013-12-04 07:57:36
全體區議員(458人) + 全體立法會議員 (建議2016年增至90人) + 工商金融界(60人) + 專業界(60人) + 勞工社會服務宗教界(60人) = 728人;區議會及立法會議員佔總額的四分之三

由 楊貫人 2013-12-04 05:29:51
提名委員會其基本概念是由本負責選出「行政長官選舉委員會」的各界別選民組成行政長官提名委員會,直接參與提名行政長官候選人,而不再經業界各組別的分組代理人代表。(各界別登記的選民人數約為240,000與300,000之間。)

由 Calvin 2013-12-04 01:29:07
所有選民

由 Tommy Cheung 2013-12-04 01:12:29
若公民提名不是提名委員會部分,那提名委員會的人數應是立法會議員/區議會議員人數總和

由 DC 2013-12-04 00:36:23
全港劃為20選區,每區選出20名委員,再加上所有民選立法會議員(包括地區議席及區議會(第二)功能組別)

由 Jonathan Ip 2013-12-03 23:06:02
由現時35位直選立法會議員組成

由 TY Woo 2013-12-03 22:44:21
不重要。

由 LAU 2013-12-03 21:40:07
1% of HK population

由 王孜敬 2013-12-03 20:49:16
我認為應包括以下人士/組織︰ 全數區議員﹑ 大型非牟利機構代表 (包括本地慈善團體)﹑ 各界別人士 (可參考現時功能組別分類方法),再加上現時已符合資格的委員,另外可考慮隨機抽選市民 (分幾個年齡界別) 約100-200 人參與提名

由 Wong Cheuk Kan 2013-12-03 17:15:39
如果按照基本法循序漸進的原則, 提名委員會人數應該至少比現在增加一倍

由 Kelvin Chu 2013-12-03 16:59:30
由立法會大多數議員所支持的某一議員出任

由 Thomas 2013-12-03 16:31:00
The number of members is not the main point of how truly they can reflect the choices from the citizen. Therefore the focus should base on how these people are elected and how they are distributed among the society

由 Johnny Li 2013-12-03 14:26:36
全體登記選民自動成為提名委員會委員

由 徐傑生 2013-12-03 13:21:56
只要有公民提名權,實際人數就不太重要

由 劉穎匡 2013-12-03 13:18:36
全體立法會議員。

由 Yin Chi Chan 2013-12-03 13:16:38
All *directly elected* District Council and Legislative Council members.

由 CHAU DICKSON KA FAAT 2013-12-03 12:59:23
可以由區議員及立法會成員組成

由 Jennifer Eagleton 2013-11-25 10:57:12
I don't think it is a numbers issue - as long as all members of the committee are directly elected by universal suffrage.

由 C K Low 2013-11-24 12:11:57
I have set the rationale out in my paper titled SELECTING THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HONG KONG IN 2017 which is available at www.ssrn.com/author=332882

由 何濼生 2013-11-22 00:20:42
增加民選的提名委員為最直接最簡單的方法去提高提名委員會的認受性。

由 Guest 0000-00-00 00:00:00
人數多少與否,提名委員會必須符合均衡參與原則,不能由某部分人(商界)獨大,也不應出現如漁農界比法律界提委人數多,但實際人數較少的情況。