更多意見


第 4 部分

提名委員會的選民基礎
問題2:應否以公司票或團體票選出提名委員會的部份委員?
由 Donald Tsang 2015-05-25 23:46:18
The company doesn\'t represent the decision of the whole. Let everyone speak. This step is merely a voting.

由 Wu Kwan Cheung 2014-11-17 19:01:11
對全港選民並不公平及不公義,延續工商界有特權享用免費政治午餐。

由 Lui Kenneth Kin Wai 2014-07-23 14:07:05
公司票扼殺該行業從業員的提名權,對個人政治取態漠視

由 Brian 2014-05-11 23:07:44
As corporations are a major influence in the Hong Kong mentality and functionality, I believe that they hold a right to vote as they provide a purely economic stand point and perspective.

由 Jasmine Kan 2014-05-09 23:24:30
Every individual has their distinct opinions and views. Corporate voting by means is voting based on a certain group\'s interests but I believe that it cannot fully express every individual\'s view. There may also be an occurrence of a bribery for corporates to vote for certain members during the decision process within the corporation therefore corporate voting should not be used to elect some members of the the nominating committee as it is ineffective and the choices made may be inequitable.

由 Mike Hung 2014-05-06 17:41:06
公司不是一個人吧 為何以一個死物去固定一群人的政治取態?

由 Wong Yin Pok Asgard 2014-05-06 16:52:46
香港僱主心態、打工文化不言而喻

由 李樂軒 2014-05-04 00:09:23
公司票或團體票導致選舉不公,一人多票的情況屢見不鮮,公司票或團體票制度早就應該予以廢除。

由 khc 2014-05-03 19:38:22
不要政治特權,用公司票會擴大財團的政治影響力,加劇官商勾結,而每個團體的代表不同,民主成份也不同,這令每票都不平等,加上這會歧視同樣參與這界別卻不是團體成員的市民。

由 金蘭芳 2014-05-03 10:25:48
公司票或團體票只是制造小圈子特權

由 Yuen Chi Chung 2014-05-03 01:20:54
有錢有能力的人, 可開設多家公司以取得投票資格, 此為種票行為. 只有廢除公司票才可堵塞漏洞.

由 周頌堯 2014-05-03 00:52:19
公司票或團體票有欠透明度。

由 Elsie 2014-05-02 23:07:18
恐公司票或團體票,水準太參差,我們需要水準高(盡量)委員

由 Rishi Kukreja 2014-05-02 22:45:58
Definitely not. This is one of the major stumbling blocks in truly reflecting the wishes of Hongkongers. It is an outdated system that is as far away from fairness and equality as possible. Corporate voting must no longer blight our political landscape (though it will remain in the form of financial donations to political parties).

由 sn HO 2014-05-01 00:40:19
團體票不公平,也容易出現種票。

由 Leung Kwan Yuk 2014-04-30 17:08:44
公司票根本是利益者 過去十多年的經驗得知 公司票是萬惡

由 Brian 2014-04-30 11:56:52
公司票容易產生選舉漏洞,應以廢除,舉例同一股東,可以不同公司名義注冊相同界別的公司,從而獲得多於一選票之不公平現象。

由 Pat Lau 2014-04-30 01:48:59
從前社會大眾相對沒有足夠的知識及資訊去協助社會的前進及發展,一般都依靠有識之士,社會精英去決定未來發展。但數十年來教育的譜及,加上資訊的流通,現在不應再沿用精英治港,反而是全港市民共同推進。

由 Cassandra Leigh Ward 2014-04-29 15:26:48
When corporate voting is introduced into a society, problems arise. Corruption is a major component of corporate voting in the way that major companies often own the smaller companies and therefore instead of the company having on 1 vote, it has more than 1 vote.

由 Erwin Lee 2014-04-28 02:44:08
Corporate voting raises two issues. Firstly, essentially the head of the corporation decides on who they are voting for so corporations have too much weight and power when electing the Nominating Committee. This leads to the second issue, corporations do not have a political agenda, but rather, an economic one. While an economic agenda definitely improves the economy, it distorts political agenda into something that may only improve the economy, when the goal is to assist the people. Corporate voting also clashes with Hong Kong\'s free market economy, where Hong Kong has thrived in this system of lack of government control in the economy, and the opposite should also be observed, where corporations should not have an opinion in politics, because it would result in the government manipulating the economy to assist corporations, and any government intervention in the economy should not be allowed.

由 Jessica 2014-04-27 23:16:08
By using corporate voting, companies can just vote as a whole company rather than having every single person vote. The company will be able to collect all the opinions of the people and just put it all in one vote.

由 David 2014-04-27 18:34:54
Corporate voting is I believe too prone to corruption. Money is a different aspect of society, away from politics. Corporates should be more engaged and have more power in terms of the economy rather than having political voices, is which I believe the rights for the people rather than the corporate. An existing problem of corporate voting is the unknown voter. An individual that may own a number of corporates will follow a single individual;s vote and apply to all of his corporate votes. This is a wrong representation of democracy.

由 霍漢橋 2014-04-18 23:05:31
這裡指的部分委員是功能組別的議員。 立法會的功能組別的選民基礎應大為擴闊至不同行業的從業員,可參考彭定康90年代實行的功能組別『新九組』。

由 陳沛曦 2014-04-17 00:29:41
公司票在行政長官選舉沒有意義,因許多團體票根本不是由團體的成員一人一票選出,而且也無法同時代表團體成員中的所有選民,有違提名委員會代表全港市民的精神。

由 何境豐 2013-12-25 10:58:56
由於行政長官普選是由全港選民一人一票選出,所以提名委員應能充分代表選民意志,而非由公司或團體,以展現提名委員會的「廣泛代表性」。

由 黃君亮 2013-12-11 01:02:59
但應該縮少公司票數於各界別總和的半數,如第一界別內(飲食界)總數為十七席,應將九席劃出由業界內合資格選民進行界內間選

由 David TIU 2013-12-05 16:29:54
為加強「提名委員會」的認受性,應將公司票分拆成該公司的個別管理層和管理級專業人士。

由 Alan Lau 2013-12-05 00:19:34
公司團體票會帶來種票和不公平等問題。

由 Dick 2013-12-04 10:04:43
公司及團體較易被操控,很難保証公司及團體票代表公司及團內部的主流意見. 公司及團體的利益平行由提名委員會考慮即可.

由 KCM 2013-12-04 08:58:13
During the early Republican period (1911-1928), there were many \\\"one-man\\\" or extremely small \\\"organisations\\\" that gained disproportionate influence

由 張博文 2013-12-04 07:57:36
應全部改為董事/幹事個人票。

由 楊貫人 2013-12-04 05:29:51
上述所有界別的從業員,只要能符合香港選舉法,均己被登記或可登記成為提名委員。在提名委員會是沒有公司票,整個組織/公司的成員或僱員均直接被註冊或可重新登記為提名委員會成員。

由 Jonathan Ip 2013-12-03 23:06:02
不應該。但政黨除外。

由 Wong Cheuk Kan 2013-12-03 17:15:39
公司團體投票會令富人可以透過分拆/新設公司增加對選舉的影響力, 變相削弱其他公司團體票的票值

由 Ying 2013-12-03 17:05:40
voting is a personal right, not a corporate one.

由 劉穎匡 2013-12-03 13:18:36
應於2016年立法會選舉取消功能組別公司票或團體票。

由 Yin Chi Chan 2013-12-03 13:16:38
Each District Council may forward one candidate. The Legislative Council may forward any number of candidates, as long as each candidate receives at least five nominations.

由 Jennifer Eagleton 2013-11-25 10:57:12
It should be abolished at once.

由 C K Low 2013-11-24 12:11:57
With one caveat namely that we consider expanding the size of electorates to enfranchise more electors: see SELECTING THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HONG KONG IN 2017 which is available at www.ssrn.com/author=332882

由 Guest 0000-00-00 00:00:00
公司票在行政長官選舉沒有意義,因許多團體票根本不是由團體的成員一人一票選出,而且也無法同時代表團體成員中的所有選民,有違提名委員會代表全港市民的精神。