更多意見


第 5 部分

行政長官候選人的提名方法
問題1:提名委員會委員應否以(不記名方式)投票來提名參選人?
由 Donald Tsang 2015-05-25 23:46:18
To raise transparency.

由 Lui Kenneth Kin Wai 2014-07-23 14:07:05
這取決於提委會人數與組成 在選民基礎闊的制度下,公開提名有助市民了解提委的政治立場,亦避免提委以市民民意之名上台,行個人私利背離選民為實 除非極權制度下,當權者會秋後算帳,則需要不記名以保護少數派

由 Brian 2014-05-11 23:07:44
I believe that the current system of submitting a nomination form consisting of signatures and names is sufficient in determining chief executive candidacy, as this form of nomination is already in of itself a form of \"voting\" as it requires people to agree and give consent to future leaders.

由 Jasmine Kan 2014-05-09 23:24:30
I believe that voting by secret ballot to nominate candidates is more efficient. Through this method, members of the nominating committee will not be pressured to vote for certain candidates. On the other hand, through the method of signing, members have possibly been obliged to sign for certain candidates and not under their will due to pressures placed on them at the spot.

由 Mike Hung 2014-05-06 17:41:06
最少要記名投票 人民代表所做的,人民應有權知曉

由 Wong Yin Pok Asgard 2014-05-06 16:52:46
記名能供後人從歷史中,問罪之用 不記名卻能減輕提名人受外在壓力的影響 但我不認為「憑良心投票」會在香港發生

由 Chen Chapman 2014-05-04 00:10:17
建議由全體立法會議員組成特首提名委員會,然後由全港市民一人一票選特首,此舉可形成內閣政制, 又符合基本法有關特首提名委員會的規定。 機構提名則基本法所無,故不可考慮。

由 李樂軒 2014-05-04 00:09:23
參選人能收集足夠的簽名,足以反映參選人獲得一定程度的支持,理應自動確立為候選人,毋須所有提名委員會委員投票確立其候選人資格。

由 khc 2014-05-03 19:38:22
如果必須由選舉委員會成員簽名,則必須有這簽名人數的十部到百部的選民簽名支持,以防選舉委員會成員閉門造車,私相授受,同時兩者必須要公開支持者的名單,不可以接受選舉委員會簽名支持者後來投給另一位侯選人,如果這樣應該取消這一票甚至將侯選人剔除在外,自己人都不支持的侯選人一定不能統治香港。

由 Bosco Li 2014-05-03 03:55:23
Everyone has the right to vote for their government. A democracy should be where all citizens are freely allowed to express their opinions on the government. A public ballot has negatives like peer pressure and influence for political figures. A secret ballot will eliminate these problems.

由 周頌堯 2014-05-03 00:52:19
不記名方式比起集合簽名有更大的私隱保障,為現今社會合理的做法。

由 Elsie 2014-05-02 23:07:18
人有劣根性,方便那些「表面跟您好,內裡想致您於死地」的人所掩飾!

由 Rishi Kukreja 2014-05-02 22:45:58
As mentioned before, the NC should operate in a transparent manner and be accountable to the people of Hong Kong. As such, no secret ballots or closed-door deliberations will be tolerated. The current nomination method ensures a low threshold and has worked well in the past, and should continue. Imposing a threshold higher than 1/8, secret ballot or block voting would be a step away from \"democratic procedures\" and impose unreasonable restrictions on candidates.

由 Ryan Chiu 2014-05-02 18:14:28
唉, 成份問卷都假設一定要經提名委員會, 咁問乜遮!

由 James 2014-04-30 18:35:22
We need a honest and fair election!

由 Leung Kwan Yuk 2014-04-30 17:08:44
提名人和投票人理應保持機密 只有充份証據證明該提名有問題 先可以公開 不過已經是ICAC做的工作

由 Brian 2014-04-30 11:56:52
不記名方式是減少選舉舞弊的有效措施。

由 Cassandra Leigh Ward 2014-04-29 15:26:48
A system of voting is the only way to ensure that the will of the people is expressed

由 Erwin Lee 2014-04-28 02:44:08
Public ballots allow for to much peer pressure, persuasion, and influence for someone who is supposed to be making an unbiased guess. Using the electoral college in the United States as an example, not is there a secret ballot, but the members of are also not disclosed. This is to prevent manipulation and backlash from the public, so Hong Kong should observe this also.

由 Reb 2014-04-27 23:40:32
Every voter has the right to vote confidently and independently without any fear of discrimination at the end of the election or during the process. A true and successful democracy should enables a platform where citizens of all fields are allowed to express their political beliefs.

由 Jessica 2014-04-27 23:16:08
How should the people of Hong Kong trust the nominating committee to nominate the candidates that we want?

由 David 2014-04-27 18:34:54
No, the existing method of signing is a legible way of nominating candidates. However I believe there should be less than 150 signatures that will approve the legibility of the candidate. Atleast 10% of the total population of election committee members should sign for the eligibility of a candidate.

由 陳沛曦 2014-04-17 00:29:41
提名委員會的意義在於選出最多人支持的數位候選人,而不是最少人反對的候選人。如果要求提名委員會以投票方式決定參選人能否成為候選人,則有違提名委員會的意義。

由 Richard Tsang 2014-02-17 19:25:24
只要符合基本法規定當行政長官的條件如年滿四十、居港滿二十年、冇外國護照、本港中國公民等便可向提委會報名,交一定數目的按金。好似立法會選舉。然後經提委會全體大會投票, 每一委員可選多於一名候選人。任何候選人只要得到三份一票就可正式成為特首候選人。

由 Tsz Kwan Cheng 2014-02-14 10:06:24
Should be as transparent as possible

由 何境豐 2013-12-25 10:58:56
提名委員會的提名程序應該要能體現選民意志和各界別的均衡參與,而非只體現提名委員的個人意志,從而達致提名程序是個「民主程序」。

由 黃君亮 2013-12-11 01:02:59
應盡量提供充足自由度給各提名委員會委員投票予合資格的候選人,符合普及而平等之選舉

由 Daniel John Gittings 2013-12-09 17:16:44
As stated by Professor Albert Chen, the term \"democratic procedures\" in Article 43(2) is broad enough to embrace a continuation of something similar to the existing nomination procedure.

由 Man Chun Wai 2013-12-09 08:27:38
提名委員會選舉時該提委候選人應該已決定當選後提名 誰/哪個派別的人士 當候選人。故其提名應為其選舉承諾, 故應公開。

由 David TIU 2013-12-05 16:29:54
投票為最簡單直接的符合「按民主程序提名」的模式,日後可再作優化。

由 Alan Lau 2013-12-05 00:19:34
高透明度,可讓選民監察推選委員會委員,因此,民主程序需要用記名投票。而且,投票只會在參選人超過十位時出現。

由 Tenny Hui 2013-12-04 14:39:36
提名委員會應為現任直選立法局(35+5)再加全港區議員.需要40名直選立法局議員最少3名或最少8%區議員提名

由 KCM 2013-12-04 08:58:13
secret ballot is the very foundation of parliamentry democracy

由 Jonathan Ip 2013-12-03 23:06:02
不應該(應記名)。若然採用政黨提名方式,政黨的提名選擇也應該公開。

由 米兜 2013-12-03 16:05:03
也可以公開一次性提名。

由 徐傑生 2013-12-03 13:21:56
提名有被問責的必要

由 Jennifer Eagleton 2013-11-25 10:57:12
All voting always should be secret ballot.

由 Guest 0000-00-00 00:00:00
提名委員會的意義在於選出最多人支持的數位候選人,而不是最少人反對的候選人。如果要求提名委員會以投票方式決定參選人能否成為候選人,則有違提名委員會的意義。