更多意見


第 5 部分

行政長官候選人的提名方法
問題3: 應否規定參選人必須從提名委員會的某一個或多個界別中取得一定的提名數目?
由 Wu Kwan Cheung 2014-11-17 19:01:11
不必特別偏袒照顧各別界別人士。

由 Brian 2014-05-11 23:07:44
I believe that by having a sector particular nomination requirement, the candidate will be forced to gain the support of all sectors and not abuse favor in one sector. This ensures that the interest of the candidate covers all the sectors and their respective issues, as well as allows more consensus within the nominating committee as all the sectors have to nominate the candidate.

由 Jasmine Kan 2014-05-09 23:24:30
By having a minimum number of nominations come from one or more of the sectors, it can ensure that the candidate is an all rounded person through the approval (nominations) by nomination committee members of different industries.

由 李樂軒 2014-05-04 00:09:23
本人建議提名委員會的組成方法就是所有合資格的選民自動成為提名委員會的一員,不分界別。

由 Chan Sau Yi 2014-05-03 23:49:50
本人建議提委會分兩組,A組處理沒有足夠公民提名的人士,這些人士需要拿到選委會委員的最低提名選票,才能成爲候選人。每名選委會委員可作不多於三個候選人的提名;另一組別B組處理有不少於全港百分之一公民提名的人士,但每一公民只限作出一個提名。由於此等人士有大量公民提名,已有足夠代表性,所以可以在B組,由代表公民界別團體票的特別提名委員會,直接提名成爲候選人。這團體票的特別提名委員會,也可否決提名,不過必須根據某些既定規定,例如獲公民提名人士有犯刑事罪記錄,或年齡不符合當特首等等,方可否決提名。

由 Elsie 2014-05-02 23:07:18
諉選佔最多數目的哪一個人

由 Rishi Kukreja 2014-05-02 22:45:58
The current method does not require support from all sectors, which I believe is sensible and ensures a low nomination threshold. Instituting such a requirement would be overly restrictive, and with the current illogical set-up of the EC likely result in candidates from certain political backgrounds being blocked/screened out.

由 Ryan Chiu 2014-05-02 18:14:28
唉, 成份問卷都假設一定要經提名委員會, 咁問乜遮!

由 sn HO 2014-05-01 00:40:19
某界別即不公平。

由 Leung Kwan Yuk 2014-04-30 17:08:44
無論任何界別 主要得到提名數就可

由 Pat Lau 2014-04-30 01:48:59
因提名委員會或未能完全代表每一位市民,所以公民提名有必要,以確保所有人有選舉權及被選權。

由 Chapman 2014-04-29 16:50:39
以界別分拆提名委員會,實際是拒絕某些界別參與提名。 提名委員會不應有界別之分

由 Cassandra Leigh Ward 2014-04-29 15:26:48
In the interest of broad representation, a specific number of nominations have to come from each sector. It is only fair and that way, all sectors have a say in becomes Chief Executive

由 Erwin Lee 2014-04-28 02:44:08
While a minimal approval from the various sectors means that there is a general consensus that the individual may make a good candidate, a candidate with a mixed ideology would slow progress. The various candidates should reflect different opinions and want to tackle different problems with different solutions, then the public should vote for which person they believe has the necessary potential to make the best changes in the system. Having approval from the various sectors means that each candidate\'s ideology is more similar, since each sector approves of him/her.

由 Reb 2014-04-27 23:40:32
Due to the case in Hong Kong, some legislative sectors could abuse this rule for their own political interest. Therefore, I believe the current system is sufficient as long as the certain percentage of the nominating committee supports the candidate. To me, the committee merely serve as a \\\"double-check\\\".

由 Jessica 2014-04-27 23:16:08
Putting a limit to the nominations would just obstruct some people\'s view.

由 David 2014-04-27 18:34:54
Atleast 15% of the 10% should come from each of the 4 sectors of the Nominating Committee. As explicated before, the four sectors all represent the different aspects of life in Hong Kong, which is all essential parts to be heard for the opinion/voice process.

由 陳沛曦 2014-04-17 00:29:41
提名委員會是均衡地代表全港選民的一個整體,如果將其分拆開來則會破壞提委會的原本意義。

由 何境豐 2013-12-25 10:58:56
提名委員會的提名程序需體現各界別的代表都有機會參與行政長官普選。若果候選人需要得到所有界別一定提名委員提名的話,提名門檻將會大大提高,令提名委員會成為參選人的不合理限制。

由 黃君亮 2013-12-11 01:02:59
須於各界別取得一定百份比存在困難,不應在申請成為侯選人階段之時加上這等限制

由 Daniel John Gittings 2013-12-09 17:16:44
This would severely restrict the range of candidates.

由 Man Chun Wai 2013-12-09 08:27:38
某個界別集中了一人提名表市某界別抱持了一些強烈意見, 實為最後選民的參考。

由 David TIU 2013-12-05 16:29:54
應由「提名委員會」把關。

由 Dick 2013-12-04 10:04:43
我設計的提名委員會沒有界別公組. 你這個問卷沒有考慮.

由 KCM 2013-12-04 08:58:13
I prefer more sectors

由 Ying 2013-12-03 17:05:40
I think rather than dividing 12.5% by 4 (~3% each), there should be some flexibility. So 12.5% overall is required for candidacy, and also receive at least 2% of each division (but not strictly 3%).

由 米兜 2013-12-03 16:05:03
要求來自同一界別的提名數不能超過50個。

由 Jennifer Eagleton 2013-11-25 10:57:12
If all the nominating committee was directly elected (and there is not FCs on the committee), then this point is moot.

由 Guest 0000-00-00 00:00:00
提名委員會是均衡地代表全港選民的一個整體,如果將其分拆開來則會破壞提委會的原本意義。