更多意見


第 5 部分

行政長官候選人的提名方法
問題4: 應否限制獲提名的候選人之數目?
由 Wu Kwan Cheung 2014-11-17 19:01:11
提名委員會的設計和選舉抵押金已有助限制候選人之數目,無需明文立法禁止。

由 Lui Kenneth Kin Wai 2014-07-23 14:07:05
可以有初選但不應硬生生設數量限制

由 Joe 2014-06-18 15:41:17
若行政長官參選人獲超過一半直選議員支持,只會出現一位參選人

由 human 2014-05-27 21:57:28
避免造成過多候選人

由 Brian 2014-05-11 23:07:44
I believe that as long as candidates have achieved the requirements to achieve candidacy, they are entitled to run for the position of chief executive. However I must note that the requirements for candidacy are not the current requirements.

由 Jasmine Kan 2014-05-09 23:24:30
I believe that there should be a cap on the number of nominated candidates as it can make the voting process simpler and more effective. I chose to prohibit more than three candidates in any Chief Executive as it seems as if there are too many candidates running if there are four or more candidates while having a maximum of two or less seemed too few. Therefore prohibiting three or more nominated candidates seemed best suitable in this case.

由 Mike Hung 2014-05-06 17:41:06
選舉不是製造陪跑員, 就如圍標一樣的做法有何意義

由 李樂軒 2014-05-04 00:09:23
選民應獲得更多的選擇,因此不應為候選人之數目設上限,以鼓勵更多有志之士參選。

由 khc 2014-05-03 19:38:22
為民主普選設侯選人上限,荒謬絕倫,市民有權得到最多的選擇,侯選人的淘汱只能用民主政治方式內進行,不能由一班所謂代表民意的人來剔走侯選人。

由 Yuen Chi Chung 2014-05-03 01:20:54
整個選舉過程根本就是燒錢遊戲, 有心參選並不足夠. 假如沒有足夠金錢為自己宣傳, 選民根本不知道有這樣的一個參選者. 知名度不夠高, 當選機會相對一定低. 不限參選人數是為體現公平及民主.

由 林栢熙 2014-05-02 23:23:18
一政黨一個候選人

由 Rishi Kukreja 2014-05-02 22:45:58
I can see no sensible reason for restricting the number to an arbitrary number, other than that such a rule would aid in such undemocratic practices as rooting out certain candidates of certain political backgrounds on the pretext of there not being any more room on the ballot paper. Arguing that too many candidates would overwhelm Hong Kong people would be a grave insult to all Hongkongers, most of whom are highly educated and perfectly able to make a choice among many. As such, I am strongly against imposing a limit (other than those dictated by mathematics) to the number of candidates that may be put forward for election.

由 Ryan Chiu 2014-05-02 18:14:28
唉, 成份問卷都假設一定要經提名委員會, 咁問乜遮!

由 Leung Kwan Yuk 2014-04-30 17:08:44
十人都足夠 候選人都會為選票會協調政策方向

由 Brian 2014-04-30 11:56:52
不應窒礙有志參與建設香港之有識之士,另外取得最低限度的提名數目已能某程度上限制了人數。

由 譚志良 2014-04-29 21:02:03
我認為候選人不應該太多 除非香港的投票制度容許有多輪投票 因為避免有候選人以低支持率當選。例如 如果真的有十個候選人 但最高票只有11%人支持,那對大多數人來說便不公平了

由 周偉雄 2014-04-29 17:09:53
因為所有有意參選人,需要獲取一定數目的提名委員會委員的提名,這個已經是一個門檻,無需要再設立任何不必要的關卡限制人參選。

由 Cassandra Leigh Ward 2014-04-29 15:26:48
There should be a maximum of three candidates in order to ensure that a majority occurs.

由 Erwin Lee 2014-04-28 02:44:08
While the more candidates there are, the more opinions and ideologies are being expressed, at one point, it only harms the election process as there are too many possible people to vote for. The ideal situation is having clearly identified candidates with various ideologies and plans to vote for. In addition, a clear majority should be identified in the final vote, so that it shows that people actually want this individual to become Chief Executive.

由 Jessica 2014-04-27 23:16:08
There should be more candidates to run for Chief Executive even if they might not even have the chance to become the Chief Executive. It will give a chance for those who wants to run for Chief Executive.

由 David 2014-04-27 18:34:54
There should not be any cap to nominated candidates. Every option should be available. There is always a chance that the perfect nominee was unable to be chosen due to a simple restriction that should be eliminated.

由 陳沛曦 2014-04-17 00:29:41
提名委員會應是由全港選民選出,而委員的提名理應代表香港選民的意願。因此,對提委會提名的候選人數目設限即是爲選舉提供不合理限制。加上提名門檻已經確保了候選人獲得一定選民基礎支持,因此再爲候選人數目設限是不必要及不合理。

由 Jason 2014-04-13 21:17:55
A limit is required under the 2007 NPCSC decision where it states \"that the nominating committee shall in accordance with democratic procedures nominate a certain number of candidates for the office of the CE\"

由 L. Langer 2013-12-26 13:50:54
The answer to this question depends on the method through which the CE will eventually be elected by the electorate. There is not Point in having a simple-majority voting System and present 20+ candidates.

由 何境豐 2013-12-25 10:58:56
世界各地的選舉制度都很少限制候選人數目,而嚴格限制候選人數目亦會使部份有意參選而且能取得足夠提名的人士無法參與,亦不能為普選帶來適合的競爭。

由 黃君亮 2013-12-11 01:02:59
以公平原則為由,只須申請候選人能取得選舉委員內12.5%選民已能作一定限制作用

由 Daniel John Gittings 2013-12-09 17:16:44
Nomination threshold will act as a de-facto cap if each member is only allowed to nominate one candidate.

由 David TIU 2013-12-05 16:29:54
應確保不同民意在競選過程中有充份發聲機會,太少候選人不利於民主發展。但相對地,太多候選人會令過多不同意見參雜於重要選舉議題之中,做成當選者代表性不足。

由 Alan Lau 2013-12-05 00:19:34
在10%的限制下,上限十位是理所當然的。

由 KCM 2013-12-04 08:58:13
should not impose a number, the 15% nomination requirement practically limits the number of candidates

由 張博文 2013-12-04 07:57:36
需與對本部分問題2的答案相符。

由 Jonathan Ip 2013-12-03 23:06:02
提名的難度本身應該足以反映成為候選人所需的認受性,無需要再設上限

由 Ying 2013-12-03 17:05:40
There is already an indirect limit of 8 candidates. No need to add another limit.

由 Thomas 2013-12-03 16:31:00
The cap is implied by the min. of nominations. Also the barrier (costs to be used in the election, popularity) should have been high enough to avoid too many people for the election.

由 米兜 2013-12-03 16:05:03
設立門檻本身就已經將候選人人數限制在一定範圍之内了。

由 Johnny Li 2013-12-03 14:26:36
只須實行法國式兩輪絕對多數制即可解決候選人「過多」問題

由 Ivan 2013-12-03 13:06:34
It depends on whether a second or third round of election would be held to narrow down the number of candidates

由 Jennifer Eagleton 2013-11-25 10:57:12
I think that if candidates have to get a minimum percentage there will be a natural limitation, but not too much.

由 C K Low 2013-11-24 12:11:57
By definition if the nominations were evenly and equally allocated a 'natural limit' would result.

由 Guest 0000-00-00 00:00:00
提名委員會應是由全港選民選出,而委員的提名理應代表香港選民的意願。因此,對提委會提名的候選人數目設限即是爲選舉提供不合理限制。加上提名門檻已經確保了候選人獲得一定選民基礎支持,因此再爲候選人數目設限是不必要及不合理。