更多意見


第 5 部分

行政長官候選人的提名方法
問題5: 參選人所獲得的提名數目可否超過最低限度提名數目?
由 Donald Tsang 2015-05-25 23:46:18
Proportionately in accordance to % change.

由 Brian 2014-05-11 23:07:44
This ensures that the candidate is truly getting the support and interest of the committee and not just getting enough to be nominated. This results in dedication and resolve in the candidates.

由 Jasmine Kan 2014-05-09 23:24:30
This practice should be continued so the candidates can see what their ranking is within themselves even if they have all reached the minimum number of signatures for candidacy.

由 Mike Hung 2014-05-06 17:41:06
這看提名委員在做甚麼吧

由 Wong Yin Pok Asgard 2014-05-06 16:52:46
為免壟斷之局以及引入競爭

由 李樂軒 2014-05-04 00:09:23
參選人獲得比提名門檻更多的提名數目,不失為一種選舉策略,一來可反映該參選人的支持度,二來可減少其他參選人可獲得的提名數目,使用此策略並無不可。

由 khc 2014-05-03 19:38:22
但不應超過百份十,否則就會對其他侯選人不公平。此外,就像當年董建華得到一半提名一樣,有人會相信這叫民主普選嗎? 而香港近七百萬人,你相信連七十萬人中都沒有一個有統治香港才能的人嗎?

由 Elsie 2014-05-02 23:07:18
應有少許彈性

由 chan chun yue 2014-05-02 22:52:41
但需要有上限,防止沒有選擇。

由 Rishi Kukreja 2014-05-02 22:45:58
This will ensure pluralism and prevent the NC from abusing its power if it were to put all its weight behind only one or two candidates.

由 Ryan Chiu 2014-05-02 18:14:28
唉, 成份問卷都假設一定要經提名委員會, 咁問乜遮!

由 歐陽家和 2014-04-30 17:54:05
又或者,每個提名委員會的委員都可以提名多過一個人……咁就唔係咁煩啦(不過提名門檻就可以提高少少)

由 Leung Kwan Yuk 2014-04-30 17:08:44
主要擁有入場券就可 機會留比提名人選擇第二心水

由 Pat Lau 2014-04-30 01:48:59
你的問題是問“不超過”或達不到最低要求嗎?

由 譚志良 2014-04-29 21:02:03
因為這個提委會假設了提委代表人民的意願

由 Cassandra Leigh Ward 2014-04-29 15:26:48
There is no problem in obtaining more nominations than the minimum number because it shows that people really want this candidate to be there and it also shows that the candidate wants to be there.

由 Erwin Lee 2014-04-28 02:44:08
Having more than the minimum amount of nominations does not harm the candidate, in fact, it only solidifies that people want the individual to be Chief Executive. And this only further supports the desire for the will of the people to be expressed.

由 Jessica 2014-04-27 23:16:08
It wouldn\'t hurt to get more nominations than the minimum number for candidacy but it will just show that the members of the Election Committee favours that candidate.

由 David 2014-04-27 18:34:54
There should be no limit for nomination vote from the election committee, because that is the true representation of desire. Votes should not be interfered by a simple restriction that can be easily eliminated.

由 陳沛曦 2014-04-17 00:29:41
提委會委員的提名是代表選出他/她的選民的意願。因此,即使某位參選人已取得足夠提名,也不應限制提委會委員提名予該位參選人,以免限制了提委會委員的權力。

由 Tsz Kwan Cheng 2014-02-14 10:06:24
Why not!?

由 L. Langer 2013-12-26 13:50:54
Allowing unlimited signatures prejudices the voters\' choice.

由 何境豐 2013-12-25 10:58:56
提名委員是全港選民的代表,所以他們應該有自由提名的權力以代表他們所屬的界別選民。

由 Man Chun Wai 2013-12-09 08:27:38
理論值上應為10%提委數量加一人。

由 David TIU 2013-12-05 16:29:54
在「一人一提名」的模式下,應限制每名候選人得到提名的數目:一來可確保有足夠參選機會;二來可減低提名人所面對的政治壓力。

由 Alan Lau 2013-12-05 00:19:34
在提名階段,任何人只要取得足夠的公民提名即可成為參選人,準備進行提名程序。而提名程序在提名日中進行,七十二位推選委員會委員進行投票,以記名投票選出不多於十位參選人成為候選人。而開票時,只有提名票超過10%委員的才能成為候選人。少於10%的會被淘汰。

由 楊貫人 2013-12-04 05:29:51
行政長官參選人的票數如超過(提名委員會)總投票人數的75%及/或頭五位參選人是成功被提名候選人。

由 Tommy Cheung 2013-12-04 01:12:29
但不應佔整個提名委員會的提名人數20%

由 Jonathan Ip 2013-12-03 23:06:02
視乎提名委員會組成和大小

由 Ying 2013-12-03 17:05:40
I believe there should be an upper limit on the amount of support. E.g. a maximum of 300 nominations. This will force the nominees to express their support fairly early otherwise they may not be able to support the \"popular\" one. This also prevents one popular potential candidate from monopolising all the nominations, hence ensuring that there will be several candidates competing in the election.

由 米兜 2013-12-03 16:05:03
但也要有上限。

由 徐傑生 2013-12-03 13:21:56
應有上限,但數字合理即可,比如2%上限的話,不可超逾4%;10%的話,則不可逾12.5%

由 C K Low 2013-11-24 12:11:57
The adoption of an 'upper limit' on the number of nominations should be considered

由 何濼生 2013-11-22 00:20:42
應為廣大選民提供更多選擇。

由 Guest 0000-00-00 00:00:00
提委會委員的提名是代表選出他/她的選民的意願。因此,即使某位參選人已取得足夠提名,也不應限制提委會委員提名予該位參選人,以免限制了提委會委員的權力。